Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2  (all builds)
Memory14.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '22 at 13:44
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-6300 APU-$51
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 59.8
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 94.5
45% 73 Pts
4-Core 95.4
8-Core 95.7
13% 95.6 Pts
64-Core 93.6
6% 93.6 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
MSI(1462 8A9C) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 17.1
15% 17.7 fps
MRender 23
Gravity 19.1
Splatting 0.1
10% 14.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 187 192 190 192 195 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 441
Write 410
Mixed 328
SusWrite 197
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 37.4
128% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 199
155% 212 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 101%
KIOXIA TransMemory 16GB
11GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 7.1 8.2 7 8.4 7.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
8.17% Terrible
Read 32.8
Write 13.3
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 8.5
22% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.17%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKH800UD51208 Corsair CMX8GX3M1A160 16GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.1% Poor
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 10.7
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-HD2 Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2 - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback