Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$125 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Memory 74.1 1-Core 70 2-Core 124 55% 89.4 Pts	4-Core 219 8-Core 368 36% 294 Pts	64-Core 361 22% 361 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Zotac(19DA 730B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	5.08% Terrible	Lighting 6.2 Reflection 4.6 Parallax 7.8 5% 6.2 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 7.2 5% 6.07 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.08% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199 10,165 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 119 114 122 114 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 104 Write 123 Mixed 121 SusWrite 116 26% 116 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 44.7 4K Mixed 26 82% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 23.8 DQ Write 58.4 DQ Mixed 25.3 24% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-2133C10-8GAB000 F3-2133C10-8GAB000 16GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	43% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 15.1 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 12.9 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 92.3 43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	3x
CL9-9-9 D3-1333 CL9-9-9 D3-1333 CL9-9-9 D3-1333 CL9-9-9 D3-1333 16GBUnknownBench 40%, 8 samples	3x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	2x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $441