Asus Q405UA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus Q405UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q405UA
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '22 at 09:35
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 178
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 457
51% 399 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Asus(1043 1B40) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.04% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 8.2
6% 7.27 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 0.1
4% 5.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.04%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
650GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 50 57 84 70 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 28.4
Write 7.5
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 54.8
22% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
69% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 71%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
29GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 2.4 4 1.4 1.1 3.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
9.26% Terrible
Read 23.4
Write 6
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 2.3
9% 9.22 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 3
165% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.26%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MA451B Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2133, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.7
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q405UA Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Q405UA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback