MSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C94
Motherboard	MSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94) (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210512
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 15 '22 at 20:56
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 64.5 1-Core 131 2-Core 273 82% 156 Pts	4-Core 501 8-Core 841 82% 671 Pts	64-Core 1,085 67% 1,085 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Asus(1043 04FB) CLim: 1310 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.3% Poor	Lighting 16.8 Reflection 26.4 Parallax 88.6 14% 43.9 fps	MRender 63.6 Gravity 71 Splatting 45.6 48% 60.1 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 118 90 92 112 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 406 Mixed 313 SusWrite 128 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 52.4 184% 65.7 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 360 DQ Mixed 303 247% 351 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 477GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 26GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 59 47 84 77 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Read 51.4 Write 53.2 Mixed 40.4 SusWrite 64.2 39% 52.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB 12,012 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 28.8 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 26.5 63% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94) Builds (Compare 2,202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	711x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	338x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $189Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	267x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	208x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	186x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	172x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	76x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	73x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	50x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	87x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	67x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $739

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16