HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics64.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8574
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '22 at 18:41
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 244
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 611
65% 521 Pts
64-Core 704
44% 704 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
HP(103C 8574) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.6% Good
Lighting 79.4
Reflection 122
Parallax 76.2
65% 92.6 fps
MRender 95.1
Gravity 76
Splatting 69.5
64% 80.2 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1006 256GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10112006
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 748
Write 1,169
Mixed 784
203% 900 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 58.9
201% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 853
DQ Write 639
DQ Mixed 734
552% 742 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 217%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
109GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 105 104 106 106 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 74.5
Write 69.6
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 104
49% 67.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 75%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
412GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 98 100 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 65
Write 96
Mixed 87.6
SusWrite 96.4
64% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.6
152% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GS881-26N1900 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 23.3
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 24.9
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 62
65% 62 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx Builds (Compare 3,421 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback