Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX HERO  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '17 at 11:26
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 97.6
1-Core 143
2-Core 286
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 790
83% 664 Pts
64-Core 792
49% 792 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 208
Parallax 184
154% 193 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 183
Splatting 130
120% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 134%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
899GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 2,126
Write 1,436
Mixed 1,318
360% 1,627 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 47.3
205% 77.7 MB/s
DQ Read 492
DQ Write 397
DQ Mixed 177
206% 356 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 254%
Great: 302%
SanDisk Extreme II 120GB-$130
7GB free
Firmware: R1311 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 455
Write 261
Mixed 335
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 23.9
147% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 60.7
101% 199 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 101%
Corsair Force GT 60GB
4GB free
Firmware: 5.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 458
Write 83.6
Mixed 132
48% 225 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 81.3
4K Mixed 15.5
111% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 83
DQ Mixed 29.4
39% 71.3 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 69%
Samsung HN-M101MBB 1TB-$45
23GB free
Firmware: 2AR10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 61.7
Write 60.6
Mixed 70.1
49% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.23
65% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 59%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 32GB
26GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 43.3
Write 37.3
Mixed 38.4
50% 39.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.01
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 1.23
128% 3.04 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 41
MC Mixed 31.5
107% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 43.9
SC Mixed 31
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 47.9
84% 47.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX HERO Builds (Compare 4,215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $1,086
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback