Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemAlienware Aurora-R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0FPV4P
Memory22.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '22 at 10:48
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 178
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 481
50% 399 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 690 (SLI Disabled)
Nvidia(10DE 095B) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.3% Average
Lighting 61
Reflection 35.8
Parallax 45.9
50% 47.6 fps
MRender 48.7
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 36.7
34% 42 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 170 159 121 139 149 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.2% Average
Read 220
Write 209
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 144
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 13.2
43% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 90.6
117% 214 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 107%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 136 137 140 138 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 86.5
Write 88.1
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 135
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.5
294% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 108%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
2TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 102 104 105 104 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 133
Write 118
Mixed 48.3
SusWrite 100
73% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
4.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 107 111 112 109 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 188
Write 178
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 106
97% 134 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
494% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85%
Great: 109%
silicon-power 16GB
14GB free, PID 1f23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 9.6 9.7 9.6 9.3 9.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
4.94% Terrible
Read 14.6
Write 7.2
Mixed 7
SusWrite 9.5
12% 9.57 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.94%
Great: 9%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 5TB
2.5TB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 57 59 60 59 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 172
Write 165
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 58.8
143% 114 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
174% 6.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 81%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 5TB
38GB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 57 59 60 58 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 95.5
Write 112
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 58.7
102% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
119% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 81%
Maxtor Basics Desktop 1.5TB
914GB free, PID 7410
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 26.7
Write 28.2
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 20.1
32% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 20%
Seagate Desktop 3TB
2TB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 24.2
Write 20
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 16.9
26% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 33.2
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 11.8
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,696 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $272
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback