Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acidanthera MacBookPro12,1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acidanthera Mac-E43C1C25D4880AD6
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220316
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 15 '22 at 02:30
Run Duration	212 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3337U 33,616 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Memory 72.8 1-Core 35.8 2-Core 68.3 40% 59 Pts	4-Core 89.3 8-Core 94.3 12% 91.8 Pts	64-Core 92.9 6% 92.9 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 3903) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	2.22% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 3.1 Parallax 2.1 2% 2.6 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 2 Splatting 3.3 2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.22% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 1TB 1TB 878GB free (System drive), PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 20 56 4.2 42 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-186.A00LF 1x8GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 9.2 28% 9.67 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 8.8 25% 8.9 GB/s	Latency 95.2 42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	4x
GTX 940MNvidiaBench 9%, 15,731 samples	1x

SSD
SKC600MS1024G 1TBKingstonBench 94%, 76 samples	2x
hynix SH920 mSATA 256GBSKBench 70%, 756 samples	1x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	1x

RAM
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6P1 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 16GBMicronBench 48%, 34 samples	2x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B1G73QH0-YK0 16GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,257 samples	1x
KN2M64-ETB 1x8GBKingstonBench 28%, 4,781 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16