Dell Precision T5610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemDell Precision T5610
MotherboardDell Precision T5610  (all builds)
Memory115.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '22 at 18:26
Run Duration299 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2637 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 185
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 596
58% 478 Pts
64-Core 970
60% 970 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 147A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 177
Parallax 164
151% 176 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 140
Splatting 119
118% 149 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,229
Write 3,160
Mixed 3,268
720% 3,219 MB/s
4K Read 106
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 65.7
281% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 234
177% 239 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
338GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1857 1795 1891 1861 766 759 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1943
Write 1,863
Mixed 1856
SusWrite 1,488
403% 1,787 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 39.6
128% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 229
177% 243 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 220%
Great: 442%
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$62
39GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 146 149 149 149 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 158
Mixed 99.6
SusWrite 148
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.5
324% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston SL16D316R11D4KF 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 43.9
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 31.5
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T5610 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T5610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback