PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 39% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF B365-PLUS GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190920 |
Uptime | 14.9 Days |
Run Date | Jul 14 '22 at 14:03 |
Run Duration | 285 Seconds |
Run User | SGP-User |
Background CPU | 17% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
89.2%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TB
858GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 866 943 998 1065 1069 1074 MB/s
|
218%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba X300 4TB-$137
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 142 142 140 143 MB/s
|
||||
Toshiba X300 4TB-$137
3.5TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 183 189 186 186 190 MB/s
|
||||
WDC WD60 EFAX-68SHWN0 6TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 80 75 80 84 81 MB/s
|
76.8%
Very good
|
|||
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 79 74 79 83 79 MB/s
|
38.2%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00RWYB1 6TB
470GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 80 75 80 84 80 MB/s
|
46.2%
Average
|
|||
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 80 75 80 84 81 MB/s
|
45.2%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Apacer D12.2326WH.001 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
42.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $95Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 20x |
Core i7-9700FIntel $279Bench 92%, 54,980 samples | 12x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $136Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 12x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 10x |
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples | 6x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 83% - Excellent | Total price: $335 |