Intel LAPBC710

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics73.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel(R) LAPBC710
MotherboardIntel LAPBC710  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211021
Uptime27.5 Days
Run DateJul 14 '22 at 13:55
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 66.3
1-Core 148
2-Core 278
87% 164 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 603
69% 540 Pts
64-Core 642
40% 642 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$266
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.1% Very good
Lighting 98.9
Reflection 81.7
Parallax 90.5
81% 90.4 fps
MRender 82.6
Gravity 71.8
Splatting 64.2
59% 72.9 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 79%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00B00 512GB
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7301Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1020 975 971 938 978 973 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 1,788
Write 1,429
Mixed 895
SusWrite 976
284% 1,272 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 56.8
208% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,153
DQ Write 414
DQ Mixed 892
631% 820 MB/s
Poor: 166%
This bench: 230%
Great: 433%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53E1G32D4NQ-046 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
116% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 56.6
MC Mixed 41.6
129% 45.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 43.8
SC Mixed 16.3
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 100%
This bench: 116%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LAPBC710 Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel LAPBC710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback