Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FAC_A509FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FAC_A509FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509FAC
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210906
Uptime21.8 Days
Run DateJul 14 '22 at 11:39
Run Duration302 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 42%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Memory 18
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 173
47% 95.6 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 242
33% 244 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1B12) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9268
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.48% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 5.1
4% 3.93 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 8
5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.48%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-AB1 256GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0SA6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 258 420 144 159 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 896
Write 752
Mixed 588
SusWrite 240
138% 619 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 5.2
17% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 193%
SD Card 2GB
1GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 2.1 3.7 5.5 5 4.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
4.89% Terrible
Read 19.4
Write 5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 4.2
9% 8.45 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.8
44% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 4.9
21% 7.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.8
15% 5.17 GB/s
Latency 336
12% 336 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FAC_A509FA Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FAC_A509FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback