Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 23 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X505ZA
Memory6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200225
Uptime29 Days
Run DateJul 14 '22 at 08:47
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 133
57% 96.2 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 488
39% 344 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Mobile Graphics
Asus(1043 1091) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.20.02
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
8.38% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 15
9% 12.1 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 9.6
8% 9.33 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.38%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 218 212 222 218 216 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 440
Write 236
Mixed 230
SusWrite 214
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 7.9
40% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
848GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 127 131 135 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 84.7
Write 84.1
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 130
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5143EB1-CRC Kingston 9905700-015.A00G 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.9% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 19
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 19.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA Builds (Compare 232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback