Framework Laptop

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemFramework Laptop  (all builds)
MotherboardFramework FRANBMCP08
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2256 x 1504 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '22 at 02:18
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1185G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 82.2
1-Core 166
2-Core 320
101% 189 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 661
76% 591 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
Gigabyte(1458 2329) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
135% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 157
Parallax 371
136% 231 fps
MRender 260
Gravity 129
Splatting 199
160% 196 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 135%
Great: 153%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
461GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1221 1491 1366 1383 1418 1294 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 2,135
Write 1,759
Mixed 1,447
SusWrite 1,362
376% 1,676 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 72.9
239% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 777
539% 690 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 272%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD832A.M16FRS 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 42.1
MC Mixed 31.8
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 44.2
SC Mixed 21.1
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop Builds (Compare 495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Framework Laptop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback