Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U7410

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK U7410  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB2D4
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200508
Uptime23.6 Days
Run DateJul 13 '22 at 21:10
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 29%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 75.9
1-Core 131
2-Core 240
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 582
53% 446 Pts
64-Core 547
34% 547 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1E26 004A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.16% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 8.7
0% 6.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.16%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TN8U-512G-1016 512GB
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4163116
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 273 277 285 280 283 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 368
Write 413
Mixed 261
SusWrite 282
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 38.6
127% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 212
179% 264 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 28
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 26.7
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK U7410 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U7410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback