Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 22 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160307
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 13 '22 at 20:18
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 255
79% 145 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 671
71% 565 Pts
64-Core 727
45% 727 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Asus(1043 8803) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.59
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (143 fps cap detected)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 142
Parallax 143
116% 143 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 142
Splatting 142
117% 142 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 113%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 335 301 321 354 344 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,538
Write 755
Mixed 558
SusWrite 337
175% 797 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 46.1
210% 86.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1204
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 463
408% 639 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 177%
Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$123
242GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 448 303 271 258 241 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 414
Write 428
Mixed 380
SusWrite 324
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 53.3
191% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 362
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$123
259GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 450 448 454 435 384 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 427
Write 431
Mixed 391
SusWrite 433
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 50
181% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
230GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 380 386 388 387 390 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 406
Write 294
Mixed 278
SusWrite 384
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 22.4
94% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 158
128% 186 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77%
Great: 86%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$185
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 154 152 153 153 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 161
Write 146
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 152
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1
219% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 90%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GB-$165
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
87.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 28.6
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 23.8
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 13,972 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $755
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback