Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

23 months ago, 23 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD PRO A8-8600B R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G 827 User benchmarks, average bench 33% U4500, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	Memory 25.4 1-Core 55.9 2-Core 81.3 30% 54.2 Pts	4-Core 120 8-Core 121 16% 120 Pts	64-Core 117 7% 117 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics 1,720 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 80FE) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.09.04.01 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	3.71% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 6 Parallax 6.9 4% 5.73 fps	MRender 4.8 Gravity 4.7 Splatting 5.4 4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 3.71% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 416GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR043 SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 260 281 276 351 317 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	55.3% Above average	Read 284 Write 312 Mixed 252 SusWrite 287 64% 284 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 23.7 4K Mixed 20 70% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 91 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 106 79% 105 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 125%
USB Flash Disk 126GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 25GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 6.7 3.2 0.3 8.9 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	Read 136 Write 126 Mixed 119 SusWrite 11.6 126% 98.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 2.9 188% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 58%
General USB Flash Disk 64GB 2,253 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 58GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 117 Write 71.7 Mixed 73.5 104% 87.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 2.8 179% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT51264BF160B.C16F Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 8GB 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.8% Poor	MC Read 12.2 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 13.1 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 9.9 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 283 14% 283 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
PRO A8-8600B R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 33%, 827 samples	34x
PRO A6-8500B R5, 6 Compute Cores 2C+4GAMDBench 29%, 99 samples	18x
PRO A10-8700B R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 32%, 1,599 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 1,720 samples	34x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 108 samples	15x
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 3,679 samples	6x

SSD
CV3-8D128-11 SATA 128GBLiteonBench 67%, 3,445 samples	6x
SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 70%, 12,432 samples	5x
L8H-256V2G-HP 256GBLiteonBench 74%, 4,213 samples	5x

RAM
RMT3170MP68F9F1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 34%, 133 samples	5x
8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 2x4GBMicronBench 34%, 894 samples	4x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	4x