Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron E1500 322 User benchmarks, average bench 30% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	33.8% Below average	Memory 58.6 1-Core 28.2 2-Core 56.2 32% 47.7 Pts	4-Core 55.1 8-Core 55.9 7% 55.5 Pts	64-Core 55.9 4% 55.9 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 42%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3H01103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 63 36 30 37 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.7% Below average	Read 237 Write 178 Mixed 72.1 SusWrite 64.2 30% 138 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 37.8 4K Mixed 10.4 65% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 27.4 DQ Write 82.8 DQ Mixed 12.7 22% 41 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 973GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 63 37 34 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 132 Write 159 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 65.7 70% 96.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 56% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.7 12% 4.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6700Intel $44Bench 44%, 6,294 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 3450ATIBench 1%, 4,621 samples	1x

RAM
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16