Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U749

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 84% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK U749  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB2CB
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '22 at 20:07
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 25%
CPU Throttled 84%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8365U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 224
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 452
50% 396 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Device(1E26 0023) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.07% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 8.1
6% 6.63 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 11
7% 8.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.07%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TN8U-256G-1016 256GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4163116
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 198 194 183 186 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 418
Write 391
Mixed 290
SusWrite 200
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 39.3
140% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 229
193% 282 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 11.1
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 13.7
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK U749 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U749

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback