SGIN laptop

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSGIN laptop  (all builds)
MotherboardEii P142K
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '22 at 13:16
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4500
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Memory 53.7
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 146
50% 89.1 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 139
19% 139 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
2.67% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 3.3
2% 3.5 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.67%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ngff 2280 512GB SSD
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201219
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 339 372 331 350 339 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 383
Write 342
Mixed 307
SusWrite 340
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 32.3
4K Mixed 8.4
51% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 15.8
66% 144 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x6GB
2 of 2 slots used
12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.1% Above average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 21.5
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 14.3
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical laptop Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: SGIN laptop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback