Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-4400M APU 6,363 User benchmarks, average bench 35% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Memory 59.6 1-Core 56.3 2-Core 72.9 41% 62.9 Pts	4-Core 70.8 8-Core 73.9 10% 72.4 Pts	64-Core 69.4 4% 69.4 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7520G 4,996 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C0DA) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	2.61% Terrible	Lighting 3.2 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 3.1 3% 3.5 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 3.2 3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.61% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 480GB 480GB 2,159 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0628A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 214 15 110 3.7 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 399 Write 339 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 103 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 9.9 4K Mixed 1 37% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 16.8 DQ Mixed 1.2 18% 46.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5673FH0-CH9 6GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 800, 667 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.8% Poor	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 8.9 25% 8.67 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 10 24% 8.2 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 28%, 329 samples	8x
CT102464BF186D.M16 CT8G3S186DM.C16FN 16GBUnknownBench 33%, 7 samples	4x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 31%, 243 samples	4x

Value: 19% - Very poor

Total price: $27

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16