Hp-pavilion NY553AA-ABA e9220y

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	73.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago.

System	Hp-pavilion NY553AA-ABA e9220y (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN ALOE
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090821
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '22 at 04:51
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 970 2,539 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Memory 81.9 1-Core 53.1 2-Core 107 52% 80.8 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 209 28% 208 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$238 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% PNY(196E 1347) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.08 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	73.5% Very good	Lighting 91.5 Reflection 91.3 Parallax 83.8 75% 88.9 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 81.9 Splatting 73.5 71% 89.5 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 251GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 626 238 239 238 115 46 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 126%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 387GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 9.5 12 4.6 2.8 0.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 88 Write 83.5 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 8.7 46% 61 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 57%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1.5TB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 26.3 Mixed 22 SusWrite 27.1 35% 26 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 16GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 11 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 8.4 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 77.1 52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical NY553AA-ABA e9220y Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion NY553AA-ABA e9220y

CPU
Phenom II X4 910AMDBench 51%, 593 samples	9x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 970AMDBench 56%, 2,539 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	4x
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	3x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	3x

SSD
840 Evo 1TBSamsung $199Bench 105%, 23,857 samples	3x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	2x
BX100 250GBCrucial $141Bench 87%, 42,930 samples	1x

RAM
16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 4x2GBMicronBench 38%, 515 samples	5x
F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 F3-8500CL7-4GBRL00 16GBUnknownBench 30%, 45 samples	3x
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 16GBUnknownBench 34%, 166 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 23% - Poor

Total price: $199

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16