Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD PRO A4-3350B APU R4 Graphics 81 User benchmarks, average bench 34% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Memory 61.5 1-Core 36.4 2-Core 72.2 37% 56.7 Pts	4-Core 127 8-Core 130 17% 128 Pts	64-Core 124 8% 124 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 19,746 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Biostar(1565 170A) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.12 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.36% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 5 Parallax 3.8 2% 3.8 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.5 3% 3.3 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.36% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP S 600 120GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: R052 SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 157 93 79 89 78 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 385 Write 321 Mixed 49.3 SusWrite 128 49% 221 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 26.3 4K Mixed 11.8 53% 18 MB/s	DQ Read 86.6 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 1 44% 102 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 8G1600CL11 1x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.2% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 7.4 20% 6.97 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 7.5 18% 6.47 GB/s	Latency 123 32% 123 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
PRO A4-3350B APU R4 GraphicsAMDBench 34%, 81 samples	16x

GPU
Radeon R4AMDBench 2%, 19,746 samples	11x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples	1x

RAM
9905471-006.A02LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 47%, 143 samples	1x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	1x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	1x

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $25

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16