Wortmann_ag TERRA_SERVER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics82.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemWortmann_ag TERRA_SERVER  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel S2600CWR
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1176 x 664 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJul 11 '22 at 07:27
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
CPU1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 56.9
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 161
57% 101 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 638
56% 475 Pts
64-Core 1,252
78% 1,252 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$250
EVGA(3842 3551) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Lighting 115
Reflection 90.4
Parallax 112
94% 106 fps
MRender 83.9
Gravity 73
Splatting 65
60% 74 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 227 227 229 229 229 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 424
Write 434
Mixed 308
SusWrite 253
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 46.8
159% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 327
253% 346 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 114%
Avago MR9363-4i 600GB
131GB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 105 110 104 104 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.9% Very good
Read 138
Write 118
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 106
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 2.4
649% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40EB1-CRC 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
73.8% Very good
MC Read 46
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 26.6
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 14.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TERRA_SERVER Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Wortmann_ag TERRA_SERVER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 10% - Very poor Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback