Lenovo 20N90021BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20N90021BR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20N90021BR
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220314
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateJul 10 '22 at 13:27
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 132
58% 96 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 324
33% 265 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Legend(17AA 5073) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9749
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.99% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 6.3
4% 5.63 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 8.5
6% 7.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.99%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CL1-4D256 256GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1S222
SusWrite @10s intervals: 563 371 96 75 77 180 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 803
Write 589
Mixed 626
SusWrite 227
125% 561 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 10.7
84% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 579
DQ Write 596
DQ Mixed 427
365% 534 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 149%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 12.9
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.8
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20N90021BR Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20N90021BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback