Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55A-UD3  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100810
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 10 '22 at 12:03
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3430
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 57.8
2-Core 116
54% 86.1 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 225
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 361C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Lighting 32.6
Reflection 33.3
Parallax 41.2
27% 35.7 fps
MRender 42.9
Gravity 42.6
Splatting 34.7
32% 40.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 58 58 56 57 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 168
Write 60.3
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 55.8
21% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 20.6
72% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 79.8
DQ Write 64.7
DQ Mixed 72.2
54% 72.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 51%
MB3000EBKAB 3TB
675GB free
Firmware: HPG6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 100 97 104 104 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 86.3
Write 89.4
Mixed 59
SusWrite 99.5
61% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 86%
Seagate ST3360320AS 360GB-$79
47GB free
Firmware: 3.AAM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 51 51 51 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 49.2
Write 20.7
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 50.2
28% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 44%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
161GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 98 97 98 99 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 114
Write 110
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 95.3
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 79%
WD 10EADS External 1TB
199GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 28 28 28 29 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 26.2
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 27.3
37% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 21%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
658GB free, PID 0216
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 28.4
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 24.1
36% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16%
Great: 20%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
8.23% Terrible
Read 31.6
Write 4.5
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 4.7
14% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 2.7
126% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.23%
Great: 17%
ST932042 3AS 320GB
33GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 34.4
Write 31.5
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 33.7
42% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
41.7% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 11.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55A-UD3 Builds (Compare 520 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback