Fujitsu D2470-A1

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 21 months ago.

System	Fujitsu D2470-A1 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2470-A1
Memory	4.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070130
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 09 '22 at 20:00
Run Duration	281 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+ 5,372 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Socket AM2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Memory 61.4 1-Core 36.7 2-Core 76.2 37% 58.1 Pts	4-Core 75.2 8-Core 73.4 10% 74.3 Pts	64-Core 76 5% 76 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon X1650 725 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B 0840) 256MB Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	0.54% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 3 Parallax 0.8 1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.54% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$117 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.6% Average	Read 236 Write 103 Mixed 89.7 SusWrite 29.3 25% 114 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 43.3 4K Mixed 25.8 96% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 8.4 DQ Write 79.5 DQ Mixed 22.2 24% 36.7 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 124%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60 16,391 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 165GB free Firmware: 3.AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 73 73 74 74 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 73.8 Write 41.3 Mixed 42.8 SusWrite 72.6 42% 57.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 44%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60 16,391 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 185GB free Firmware: 3.AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 76 76 76 76 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	43% Average	Read 74.9 Write 43.8 Mixed 45.8 SusWrite 74.8 44% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 44%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 156GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 32 34 34 34 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 33.1 Write 32.7 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 33.1 43% 31.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 1024, 1024, 2048, 2048 MB Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	18.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 5.4 17% 5.97 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 5 17% 5.97 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical D2470-A1 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu D2470-A1

CPU
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+AMDBench 36%, 5,372 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon X1650AMDBench 1%, 725 samples	1x

SSD
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $117Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	1x

RAM
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $117

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16