Lenovo 82C6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82C6  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '22 at 19:03
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Memory 33.7
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 123
41% 75.9 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 185
26% 190 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3805) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.28.10
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
2.04% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 2.9
2% 2.83 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.04%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HBJD-00BL2 256GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L2QFXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 782 810 816 793 276 186 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 929
Write 779
Mixed 780
SusWrite 610
174% 775 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 48.9
140% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 547
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 454
334% 444 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 139%
Great: 206%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3310MJ86H9F-3200 Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.1% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 13.8
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 12
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 234
17% 234 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82C6 Builds (Compare 199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82C6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback