Lenovo 4291KN6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemLenovo 4291KN6  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4291KN6
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110802
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 09 '22 at 15:54
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Memory 50
1-Core 18.8
2-Core 35.1
25% 34.6 Pts
4-Core 42.4
8-Core 39.7
6% 41.1 Pts
64-Core 46.5
3% 46.5 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21DA) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.95% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 1.7
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.95%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61170RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 379
Write 272
Mixed 210
63% 287 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 22.2
75% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 17.6
44% 93.2 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 119%
Seagate Expansion+ 512GB
477GB free, PID 231c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 24 24 23 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.6% Poor
Read 28.3
Write 21.3
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 23.2
32% 24.3 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 5.3
379% 5.2 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AM1U16BC4P2-B19H Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
22.5% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 8.7
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.4
14% 4.87 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback