Asus P9X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateJul 09 '22 at 07:15
Run Duration299 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 80
2-Core 151
66% 107 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 427
44% 355 Pts
64-Core 461
29% 461 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (143 fps cap detected)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 143
Parallax 143
116% 143 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 143
Splatting 119
106% 132 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,158
Write 3,904
Mixed 3,806
883% 3,956 MB/s
4K Read 239
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 130
596% 165 MB/s
DQ Read 692
DQ Write 448
DQ Mixed 508
396% 549 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
18GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 50 50 49 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 124
Write 48.1
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 49.4
52% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 80%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
31GB free, PID ab38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 72 66 65 68 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 29.9
Write 63.4
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 69.2
79% 53.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
176% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 75%
WD My Passport 083A 1TB
10GB free, PID 083a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 77 78 78 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 64.1
Write 73.2
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 77.5
87% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 45%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 5TB
19GB free, PID ab38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 0 3.2 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 51.5
Write 89
Mixed 20
SusWrite 14.6
58% 43.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 0.5
257% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 72%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
22GB free, PID ab21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 63 63 62 63 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 49.8
Write 32.5
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 62.1
61% 45 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 44%
SAMSUNG HD753LJ 750GB
9GB free, PID b159
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 32 32 32 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 31.4
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 31.4
41% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
90% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 28.9
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 11.2
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,712 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $508
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback