Performance Results


Gaming 185% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 185% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	204% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	283% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AERO 15 KD (all builds)
Memory	57 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211007
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 09 '22 at 04:07
Run Duration	259 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-11800H 56,029 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Memory 77.5 1-Core 163 2-Core 300 97% 180 Pts	4-Core 568 8-Core 1,050 97% 809 Pts	64-Core 1,277 79% 1,277 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 94%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660 155,335 User benchmarks, average bench 204% Asus(1043 8802); ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 3080TI 12 GB OC CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4855 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	204% Outstanding	Lighting 297 Reflection 283 Parallax 338 242% 306 fps	MRender 336 Gravity 260 Splatting 190 206% 262 fps
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 204% Great: 225%
Intel UHD Graphics 53,008 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Gigabyte(1458 75D3) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1069 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	8.44% Terrible	Lighting 9.6 Reflection 16.5 Parallax 11.4 8% 12.5 fps	MRender 12.6 Gravity 13.1 Splatting 10.2 10% 12 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.44% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 512GB 1,031 User benchmarks, average bench 287% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: EGFM13.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 842 734 724 585 547 537 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	283% Outstanding	Read 2,312 Write 2,394 Mixed 1,920 SusWrite 662 408% 1,822 MB/s	4K Read 57.8 4K Write 231 4K Mixed 85.1 319% 124 MB/s	DQ Read 1,401 DQ Write 972 DQ Mixed 1,188 887% 1,187 MB/s
Poor: 187% ↑ This bench: 283% Great: 387%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$75 92,081 User benchmarks, average bench 224% 253GB free Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1685 1038 232 297 314 297 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	257% Outstanding	Read 1540 Write 1,923 Mixed 1,617 SusWrite 644 322% 1,431 MB/s	4K Read 60.3 4K Write 182 4K Mixed 86.7 299% 110 MB/s	DQ Read 1,577 DQ Write 1,266 DQ Mixed 1,234 975% 1,359 MB/s
Poor: 144% ↑ This bench: 257% Great: 295%
SSK 500GB 297 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 418GB free Firmware: 0209 SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 389 389 387 388 388 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Read 396 Write 387 Mixed 382 SusWrite 388 88% 388 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 41.6 134% 41.3 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 181 131% 169 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF3200C20S4/32GX 2x31.5GB 1,874 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	99.9% Outstanding	MC Read 38.8 MC Write 38.3 MC Mixed 35.1 107% 37.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 37.7 SC Mixed 20.2 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 85.4 47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 99.9% Great: 106%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

CPU
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples	197x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	115x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples	80x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	1x

SSD
ESR01TBTLG-E6GBTNB4 1TBBench 313%, 1,902 samples	83x
ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 512GBBench 287%, 1,031 samples	31x
SM2P43A8-512GC 512GBBench 297%, 37 samples	10x

RAM
AO1P32NC8W1-BDAS 2x8GBAdataBench 70%, 1,014 samples	29x
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 38,732 samples	29x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	15x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16