TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Maxsun MS-H81M F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMaxsun MS-H81M F  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '22 at 02:04
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 61.3
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 144
53% 92 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 206
25% 192 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 46.3%
 Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
Asus(1043 03B0) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 21.2
Parallax 19.5
18% 20.8 fps
MRender 14.6
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 11.9
11% 14.1 fps
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 15.6%
 Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU655 120GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P190710b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 52 49 66 18 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 219
Write 296
Mixed 88
SusWrite 42.4
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 4
25% 8.8 MB/s
DQ Read 44.4
DQ Write 47.3
DQ Mixed 57.7
40% 49.8 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 20.7%
 Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-447.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 4.4
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 19% ↑
This bench: 19.8%
 Great: 31%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-H81M F Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Maxsun MS-H81M F

CPU
Core i5-4670TIntelBench 66%, 675 samples8x
Core i5-4460Intel  $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples2x
Xeon E3-1225 v3Intel  $170Bench 69%, 4,850 samples2x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples3x
GTX 780Nvidia  $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples1x
R9 270XAMD  $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples1x
SSD
SU655 120GBAdataBench 68%, 3,439 samples6x
K5-120G 120GBFaspeedBench 59%, 328 samples1x
IT LCS-128L9S-HP 128GBLiteonBench 81%, 2,338 samples1x
RAM
9905403-447.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 27%, 132 samples3x
CL11-11-11 D3-1600 1x8GBUnknownBench 29%, 2,292 samples2x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback