QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '22 at 01:24
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 47.6
1-Core 74
2-Core 152
50% 91 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 603
54% 454 Pts
64-Core 896
56% 896 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Zotac(19DA 4471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 171
Parallax 164
131% 165 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 187
Splatting 128
120% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 36 40 34 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 173
Write 30.7
Mixed 55.1
SusWrite 37.2
54% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.3% Good
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 25.6
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback