Gigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370M AORUS Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory60.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '22 at 22:30
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 210
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 643
68% 545 Pts
64-Core 671
42% 671 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$287
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 132
Parallax 130
100% 128 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 103
Splatting 97.9
91% 113 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Asgard AN2 1TNVM 1TB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.T.F.2Y Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 263 285 255 293 260 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 876
Write 283
Mixed 400
SusWrite 267
100% 456 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 41
186% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 484
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 172
186% 315 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 124%
Great: 213%
Netac 480GB 480GB
180GB free
Firmware: FW201023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 416 411 406 428 414 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 447
Write 406
Mixed 334
SusWrite 412
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 13.2
120% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 18.4
74% 160 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 99%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 960GB
261GB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 16 12 159 12 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 850
Write 180
Mixed 474
SusWrite 58.1
85% 391 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 16.7
105% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 30.2
DQ Write 488
DQ Mixed 10
82% 176 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 291%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD4AGUA8A-26N1900 89C2 KD4AGUA8A-26N1900 89C2 89C2 64GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 28.4
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 24.5
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 731 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $324
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback