HP Laptop 17-ca2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 17-ca2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 879A
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200713
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 08 '22 at 18:54
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 93
2-Core 160
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 198
29% 213 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 879A) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.44
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
6% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 8.5
5% 7.9 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 12
8% 9.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS4NFXV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 631 212 141 159 157 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 1161
Write 868
Mixed 865
SusWrite 242
175% 784 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 57.3
190% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 472
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 525
387% 505 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 142%
Great: 192%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.C8FR Kingston HP26D4S9S8HJ-8 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 28
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 23.5
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 17-ca2xxx Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 17-ca2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback