Acer Aspire A515-54G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A515-54G  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Doc_WC
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '22 at 09:46
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 76%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
45.5% Average
Memory 73
1-Core 58.6
2-Core 82
47% 71.2 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 125
15% 115 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX350
Acer(1025 1345) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1277
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 24.1
Parallax 19.5
18% 21.9 fps
MRender 17.9
Gravity 18
Splatting 0.2
9% 12 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GB
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 126 16 17 17 47 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 415
Write 484
Mixed 368
SusWrite 67.6
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 36.6
109% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 438
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 335
254% 347 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 168%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8KA-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.1% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 10
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 4
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A515-54G Builds (Compare 1,298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-54G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback