Daktech Gemini 67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDaktech Gemini 67  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1862 x 1058 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140313
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJul 07 '22 at 07:22
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 180
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 344
46% 345 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.8% Poor
Lighting 30.5
Reflection 33.2
Parallax 31.5
25% 31.7 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 32.9
Splatting 22.9
24% 31.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB3Q128G1001 128GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2230001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 105 94 98 90 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 417
Write 195
Mixed 162
SusWrite 102
48% 219 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 26.2
96% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 118
110% 173 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
443GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 165 167 169 176 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 118
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 164
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 100%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
217GB free
Firmware: CC1F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 79 82 82 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 95
Mixed 56.6
SusWrite 80.5
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 66%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB
915GB free, PID b301
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 26 26 27 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 23.2
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 25.2
33% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16%
Great: 52%
General USB Flash Disk 64GB
49GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 12 5.4 11 9.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
4.1% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 6.7
Mixed 12.9
SusWrite 10.2
14% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.1%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 CT51264BA160B.C16F Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 12GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 16.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Gemini 67 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Daktech Gemini 67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback