Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Compaq-presario GG629AA-AKV SG2006LA (all builds)
Motherboard	ECS Livermore
Memory	1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070316
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '22 at 23:15
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron D 3.46GHz 141 User benchmarks, average bench 23% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	24% Poor	Memory 43.9 1-Core 28 2-Core 27.8 24% 33.2 Pts	4-Core 25.9 8-Core 28.9 4% 27.4 Pts	64-Core 29.4 2% 29.4 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 33 48 53 54 42 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.8% Below average	Read 192 Write 106 Mixed 133 SusWrite 45.4 26% 119 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 29.7 4K Mixed 18.1 71% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 23.9 DQ Write 46.3 DQ Mixed 28.6 24% 32.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 85%
WD WD800BD-22MRA1 80GB 3,778 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 41GB free Firmware: 10.01E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 52 54 54 43 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Read 53.8 Write 52.2 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 49.6 35% 47.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.48% Terrible	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 2.8 8% 2.9 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 2.7 8% 2.77 GB/s	Latency 185 22% 185 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.48% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16