Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD G-T56N 116 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Memory 49.5 1-Core 17.3 2-Core 34.2 24% 33.7 Pts	4-Core 23.4 8-Core 37.1 4% 30.2 Pts	64-Core 35.5 2% 35.5 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% AMD(1002 9806) 64MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	0.95% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.43 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.95% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HCHP-000L1 512GB 2,316 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 443GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT05L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 111 192 183 189 186 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.2% Below average	Read 198 Write 186 Mixed 159 SusWrite 174 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 16.5 4K Mixed 6.1 30% 10.6 MB/s	DQ Read 93.8 DQ Write 73.8 DQ Mixed 80.5 61% 82.7 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 37352E4138334331 10GB 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.97 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 2.7 7% 2.6 GB/s	Latency 162 25% 162 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
G-T56NAMDBench 28%, 116 samples	5x
G-T52RAMDBench 25%, 6 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $27Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	1x
RBU-SC400S3760GA 60GBKingstonBench 68%, 5 samples	1x
MZ7LN512HCHP-000L1 512GBSamsungBench 93%, 2,316 samples	1x

Value: 19% - Very poor

Total price: $27

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16