bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory42.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121126
Uptime16.8 Days
Run DateJul 06 '22 at 09:03
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6230
None, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 81.3
2-Core 162
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 646
57% 484 Pts
64-Core 1,167
72% 1,167 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 191 192 197 151 244 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 77%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
75GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 226 204 192 146 240 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 77%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 825GB
82GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 184 183 185 142 233 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
113GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 188 188 189 146 237 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
3968, 12416 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 75.6
MC Mixed 53
158% 55.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 130%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback