Asrock X99 WS-E/10G

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 WS-E/10G (all builds)
Memory	120.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '22 at 21:01
Run Duration	372 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 7,962 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 78.8 1-Core 107 2-Core 210 74% 132 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 663 62% 515 Pts	64-Core 863 53% 863 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.25 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Lighting 39.1 Reflection 41.9 Parallax 37.6 32% 39.5 fps	MRender 49.5 Gravity 37.1 Splatting 39.6 34% 42.1 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB 10,220 User benchmarks, average bench 331% 298GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 453 457 464 465 463 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	177% Outstanding	Read 1,134 Write 987 Mixed 957 SusWrite 460 198% 884 MB/s	4K Read 49.6 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 66.5 228% 81.3 MB/s	DQ Read 826 DQ Write 652 DQ Mixed 748 557% 742 MB/s
Poor: 221% ↑ This bench: 177% Great: 431%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 93GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 100 101 101 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	71.9% Very good	Read 416 Write 379 Mixed 309 SusWrite 99.8 67% 301 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 84.4 4K Mixed 42.3 147% 52.8 MB/s	DQ Read 36.8 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 51.3 47% 69.1 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 124%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$270 5,447 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 89 90 91 93 90 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	Read 10 Write 169 Mixed 38.6 SusWrite 89.8 56% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 394% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 118%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$270 5,447 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 475GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 100 102 101 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 77 Write 154 Mixed 75.4 SusWrite 99.8 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 312% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 118%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 670GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 89 90 91 93 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Read 96.7 Write 57.3 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 89.8 58% 78.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.9 173% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 99%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$270 5,447 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 202GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 139 135 136 136 135 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Read 80.5 Write 136 Mixed 91.8 SusWrite 136 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 286% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 118%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$270 5,447 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 184 185 190 189 188 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Read 154 Write 227 Mixed 111 SusWrite 186 124% 170 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1 437% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 118%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 32GB-$13 3,792 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 0GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 107 Write 51 Mixed 16.2 60% 58.2 MB/s	4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.4 117% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 41.3 MC Write 43.7 MC Mixed 41.8 121% 42.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 20.5 SC Mixed 20.9 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 82.7 48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 137%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 WS-E/10G Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 86%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X99 WS-E/10G

CPU
Core i7-5960XIntel $504Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	3x
Core i7-5930KIntel $143Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	3x
Xeon E5-2630 v4IntelBench 63%, 1,239 samples	2x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	4x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	2x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	2x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	4x
TM8FP6512G 512GBTeamBench 195%, 6,771 samples	2x
RAIDR Express PCIeAsusBench 86%, 1,224 samples	1x

RAM
CT16G4DFD8213.M16FA 8x16GBCrucialBench 111%, 4 samples	3x
36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 4x16GBMicronBench 92%, 577 samples	1x
Dominator DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 91%, 1,076 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $863

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X99 WS-E/10G

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X99 WS-E/10G

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)