bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime169.9 Days
Run DateJul 05 '22 at 14:16
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
CPU #000, 6 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 61.2
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 138
52% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 400
42% 334 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 11GB
9GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 122 107 105 131 119 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
13% Very poor
Read 5.3
Write 87
Mixed 5
SusWrite 108
12% 51.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 2
9% 4.1 MB/s
DQ Read 16.1
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 83.2
62% 79.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 13%
Great: 94%
Vmware Virtual disk 429GB
371GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 143 141 145 132 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 390
Write 229
Mixed 207
SusWrite 127
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 12.9
45% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 142
109% 148 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 88%
Vmware Virtual disk 32GB
5GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 510
Write 132
Mixed 172
59% 271 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 14
47% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 136
103% 139 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 89%
Vmware Virtual disk 64GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 57 58 55 45 57 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 44.7
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 45.2
128% 44.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 14
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 109%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback