Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 3000G-$35 11,076 User benchmarks, average bench 53% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Memory 75.3 1-Core 104 2-Core 199 71% 126 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 288 31% 246 Pts	64-Core 259 16% 259 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics 27,821 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 876B) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	5.55% Terrible	Lighting 5.6 Reflection 9.3 Parallax 7.9 5% 7.6 fps	MRender 9.4 Gravity 6 Splatting 11.2 8% 8.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.55% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Detech 120GB 120GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0628A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 37 19 38 28 30 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 422 Write 360 Mixed 46.1 SusWrite 62.7 49% 223 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 29.2 4K Mixed 5.2 48% 17.1 MB/s	DQ Read 81.1 DQ Write 22.3 DQ Mixed 0.5 14% 34.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 85%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 8GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 4.8 5.4 5.7 5.8 5.9 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 31.9 Write 5.8 Mixed 10.8 SusWrite 5.4 14% 13.5 MB/s	4K Read 8.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 3.1 191% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8266.M8FG CT4G4DFS8266.C8FF 8GB 2933, 2933 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	94.9% Outstanding	MC Read 35.3 MC Write 37.5 MC Mixed 30.7 99% 34.5 GB/s	SC Read 24.6 SC Write 35.8 SC Mixed 26.7 83% 29 GB/s	Latency 89.7 45% 89.7 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

RAM
BLS8G4D30AESEK.M8FE 1x8GBCrucialBench 46%, 2,547 samples	20x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBTeamBench 73%, 9,275 samples	15x
2x4GBAdataBench 60%, 13,050 samples	15x

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $308

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16