Fujitsu FMVWWS17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu FMVWWS17  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB296
Memory6.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '22 at 07:24
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 120
55% 87.8 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 143
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Fujitsu(10CF 18D2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.69% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 6.6
4% 5.67 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.69%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N400 SSD 240GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFME1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 32 93 38 120 31 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.7% Very poor
Read 249
Write 97
Mixed 151
SusWrite 71.5
31% 142 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 2.4
19% 5.53 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 93%
V-GEN08SM20EG256GBM2IT 256GB
92GB free
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 111 66 73 92 67 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.9% Good
Read 446
Write 382
Mixed 360
SusWrite 127
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 18.9
84% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 40.2
83% 167 MB/s
SDHC 31GB
14GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 18 25 23 24 23 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 60.4
Write 35.5
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 22.3
26% 36 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
260% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 24%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4R8GS24A8R 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.3% Good
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 21
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 19.8
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FMVWWS17 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu FMVWWS17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback