TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 10RS005CUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10RS005CUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3136
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '22 at 02:25
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 80.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 250
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 898
81% 682 Pts
64-Core 895
55% 895 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 83.9%
 Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 3136) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1122
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.96% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 9.1
5% 8.4 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 3.96%
 Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1001 512GB
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11170101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 981 618 580 581 590 609 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,675
Write 947
Mixed 913
SusWrite 660
233% 1,049 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 63
212% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,057
DQ Write 815
DQ Mixed 926
695% 933 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑
This bench: 215%
 Great: 278%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
715GB free
Firmware: 0302
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 81.2
Write 40.4
Mixed 42.4
41% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 63%
WD My Passport 261B 1TB
329GB free
Firmware: 3005
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 246
Write 156
Mixed 142
135% 182 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
1,338% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 73%
WD Elements 2621 5TB
3TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 108
Write 99.5
Mixed 71.7
116% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 0.8
274% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.4% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 36% ↑
This bench: 48.4%
 Great: 49%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 10RS005CUS Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10RS005CUS

CPU
Core i7-9700TIntelBench 84%, 1,586 samples10x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 65,338 samples9x
T600NvidiaBench 29%, 1,270 samples1x
SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GBSamsungBench 248%, 12,020 samples5x
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1001 512GBWDCBench 214%, 9,336 samples3x
SKHynix_HFS512GD9TNI-L2B0B 512GBBench 198%, 1,464 samples2x
RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples3x
HMA82GS6DJR8N-XN 1x16GBHynixBench 41%, 2,427 samples2x
HMA82GS6DJR8N-XN Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 32GBHynixBench 79%, 11 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback