Asus P8Z77-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121219
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJul 04 '22 at 18:40
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 95.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 226
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 576
62% 494 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
Device(1545 7750) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.501.1003.0
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
7.4% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 12.8
7% 12.2 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 10.2
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.4%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY 500GB SATA SSD 500GB
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 272 273 254 272 267 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 344
Write 314
Mixed 325
SusWrite 268
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 19.1
101% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 32.1
63% 125 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
818GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 184 183 179 176 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 150
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 181
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
101% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 106%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
511GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 76 76 77 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 106
Write 76.3
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 75.5
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
289GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 125 124 125 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 122
Write 124
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 124
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 77%
ASMT 2105 500GB
13GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 118 117 119 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 89.2
Write 89.8
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 118
110% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 78%
ASMT 2115 120GB
12GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 41.2
Write 42.8
Mixed 29
SusWrite 25
46% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 185%
ASMT 2105 500GB
465GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 104 102 104 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
47% Average
Read 127
Write 130
Mixed 41
SusWrite 103
131% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 47%
Great: 159%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
67% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 20.3
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 22.5
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V PRO Builds (Compare 2,102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $851
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback