Asus P8Z77-V LX2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX2  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '22 at 11:04
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$30
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 221
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 430
58% 435 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50% Above average
Lighting 59.7
Reflection 99
Parallax 61.7
49% 73.5 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 65.7
Splatting 61.1
53% 64.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256G32MND-3310A 256GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20001P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 326 336 336 294 249 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 360
Mixed 331
SusWrite 318
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 36.9
134% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 280
232% 334 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 101%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
558GB free
Firmware: AX0R2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 110 112 111 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 105
Write 104
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 110
64% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 62%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
461GB free
Firmware: AX0A4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 91 90 91 91 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 86.4
Write 87.3
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 89.7
54% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 57%
JMicron Tech 500GB
466GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 42
Write 42.9
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 42.6
52% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 48%
SanDisk Cruzer Pop 16GB
9GB free, PID 5577
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.4 3 3.7 3.8 3.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 20
Write 9.7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 3.5
12% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.5
164% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMP6GX3M3A1600C8 029E CMP6GX3M3A1600C8 029E CMP6GX3M3A1600C8 10GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
35.8% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 10.1
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 58.2
69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LX2 Builds (Compare 1,226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback