Toshiba Satellite C800D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite C800D  (all builds)
MotherboardAMD Renmore
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '22 at 07:40
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1200 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Memory 32.3
1-Core 14.7
2-Core 25.5
17% 24.2 Pts
4-Core 18.2
8-Core 27.9
3% 23 Pts
64-Core 31
2% 31 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
Toshiba(1179 FCD3) 384MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.3 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2
1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MJA2250BH G2 250GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 9.8 11 10 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
4.87% Terrible
Read 7
Write 7.2
Mixed 6
SusWrite 9.9
6% 7.53 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 4.87%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CK0 M471B5773DH0-CK0 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.35% Terrible
MC Read 3
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.87 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 1.4
SC Mixed 1.7
4% 1.37 GB/s
Latency 241
17% 241 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 8.35%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C800D Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C800D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback