HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 85% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2271
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '22 at 04:51
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 85%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core M-5Y71
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 81.9
49% 73.9 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 121
16% 123 Pts
64-Core 91.2
6% 91.2 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 57%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 14 38 116 67 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 393
Write 280
Mixed 190
SusWrite 78.7
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 24.1
4K Mixed 10
52% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 61.6
DQ Mixed 19.2
31% 60.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida 746448-181 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 15.3
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 10.2
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook Folio 1020 G1 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 1020 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback