Lenovo 20F9004LUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 33% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20F9004LUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20F9004LUS
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180709
Uptime42.9 Days
Run DateJul 03 '22 at 08:21
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 73%
CPU Throttled 33%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 77.5
2-Core 143
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 213
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2233) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9865
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 6.4
5% 5.27 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF192HCGS-000L1 192GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT21L5Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 39 42 44 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 422
Write 48.9
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 41.8
32% 149 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 13.5
43% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 21.2
DQ Mixed 35.3
41% 74.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G1A2 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
63% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 19.9
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 19.4
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20F9004LUS Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20F9004LUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback